Hello. Everything you know is a lie.

[SageoftheSixPaths]

And there's nothing to prove you otherwise. Heck, everything you know doesn't even exist. It's a figment of your imagination, another thing that doesn't exist. Nothing exists, actually.

Except me. And including you. But I'm DEFINITELY the only thing that REALLY exists here. You only exist as a figment of my imagination. which doesn't exist. That's the truth of the matter.

Well, if there were a truth.

"But if there's no truth, then there must be only lies?" You are correct, you non-existent speck of nothing. You speak the truth.

"But how can I speak the truth if there are only lies?!" But none of that exists, silly!

The only thing that exists is you. And me. But mostly me. And not you at all. You're only a figment of my non-existent imagination.

For there is only one truth: I exist.

But if that's the only truth, then truth can't exist, either. So there is no truth. Except that one that I already mentioned. Except I didn't mention anything.

Welcome to the world of non-existence.

[Shikamaru Nara]

If I understood this theory, I would support the notion of non existence. But opposites coexist, so does that mean that the opposite of non-existence would not be the only existing thing due to the existence of coexisting opposites?

[SageoftheSixPaths]

Originally Posted by Shikamaru Nara

If I understood this theory, I would support the notion of non existence. But opposites coexist, so does that mean that the opposite of non-existence would not be the only existing thing due to the existence of coexisting opposites?

The opposite of nonexistence is existence, something that doesn't exist.

So opposites can't coexist when there's nothing to exist cooperatively with, can they? Unless they somehow find a way to stop existing simply for the purpose of not existing cooperatively, which means they wouldn't exist regardless of the fact, thus leaving a void of nonexistent cooperation between two existences that never were.

In other words, I have no idea what you're talking about.

[Axel]

Wow....you guys just blew my mind

[SageoftheSixPaths]

Originally Posted by Axel

Wow....you guys just blew my mind

What mind? xD

[Shikamaru Nara]

Originally Posted by SageoftheSixPaths

The opposite of nonexistence is existence, something that doesn't exist.

So opposites can't coexist when there's nothing to exist cooperatively with, can they? Unless they somehow find a way to stop existing simply for the purpose of not existing cooperatively, which means they wouldn't exist regardless of the fact, thus leaving a void of nonexistent cooperation between two existences that never were.

In other words, I have no idea what you're talking about.

Even if the opposite of nonexistence is existence, the fact that it has an opposite means that an opposing force exists, therefore, there is a second existence. Which means that not everything is a lie.

Yes they can. They coexist, which means as an alternative. Which is still an exsitence. For example -

If I were in a student council, and there was:

1 Representative and
1 Alternate,

The alternate would coexsist to the already existing representative as a second or alternate force.

You said that nothing exists, but opposites always coexist, so even if there is no civilization, there is always an opposite, which would be existence. Hence, the coexsistence of non existence would be existence of the existence of another existence.

In theory, anyway.

[SageoftheSixPaths]

Originally Posted by Shikamaru Nara

Even if the opposite of nonexistence is existence, the fact that it has an opposite means that an opposing force exists, therefore, there is a second existence. Which means that not everything is a lie.

Yes they can. They coexist, which means as an alternative. Which is still an exsitence. For example -

If I were in a student council, and there was:

1 Representative and
1 Alternate,

The alternate would coexsist to the already existing representative as a second or alternate force.

You said that nothing exists, but opposites always coexist, so even if there is no civilization, there is always an opposite, which would be existence. Hence, the coexsistence of non existence would be existence of the existence of another existence.

In theory, anyway.

But there is no opposite to begin with. Neither existed in the first place. There wasn't even a first place to begin with. Or anything to begin with.

But there is no student council.

There are no opposites to coexist, though. If an opposite exists, then there is nothing for it be opposite of, meaning the original never was, is, will, or could be. Opposites can't exist when there's nothing to oppose. Otherwise it stands alone, meaning it's not an opposite, but rather simply is, meaning it doesn't exist as an opposite. If opposites don't exist, then coexistence is impossible. Nothing exists.

What theory?

[Shikamaru Nara]

Originally Posted by SageoftheSixPaths

But there is no opposite to begin with. Neither existed in the first place. There wasn't even a first place to begin with. Or anything to begin with.

But there is no student council.

There are no opposites to coexist, though. If an opposite exists, then there is nothing for it be opposite of, meaning the original never was, is, will, or could be. Opposites can't exist when there's nothing to oppose. Otherwise it stands alone, meaning it's not an opposite, but rather simply is, meaning it doesn't exist as an opposite. If opposites don't exist, then coexistence is impossible. Nothing exists.

What theory?

The existence of nonexistence is existence. Nothing cannot be a figment of my imagination. Which means that opposites exist.

It's just the example I was using.

You claim that there are no opposites to coexist, but this is proof of your acknowledgement of the fact that there can be opposites and coexistence of opposites given certain circumstances.

Zero's opposite is zero. Although zero is nothing, it's still something. Rather than zero not having an opposite, it is the middle of negative integers and whole numbers, which makes it the middle. This means that zero is the coexistence of zero. In this case, I have proven that nothing itself can have a coexistence.

On a side note, you mentioned that everything is a figment of our imagination. But isn't imagination part of a brain which exists?

If there is no theory, then there is no English, then there is no interaction, then there is no discussion or nothing because nothing is undefined.

[SageoftheSixPaths]

But your imagination doesn't exist. You don't exist. So nothing you believe matters, as it doesn't exist in the first place.

Nothing doesn't exist. It's got no opposite, so it clearly cannot have a stand-alone purpose. Since there is no purpose, there is nothing. Since there is nothing, it doesn't exist.

I made no such claim. I don't believe that I have ever made a claim, for to claim would mean to acknowledge, and to acknowledge would mean to know, and to know something that something must first exist. Since something does not exist, as does nothing, I did none of the things you have said. In fact, I've never done anything at all.

[Shikamaru Nara]

You only exist as a figment of my imagination

That's proof. Even if you said it doesn't exist.

[sasu_girl]

then.... red doesn't exist?

[Shikamaru Nara]

Yes he does. He is the coexsitence of anti-red.

[Shikamaru Nara]

Now that I'm rereading this, I was like, lolwut. xD

I still stand by the fact that coexistence exists to nonexistence which makes there be two exisistences although of different kind.

[Crisis]

My eyes crossed.

[Shikamaru Nara]

Mine too afterwards.

[ItachiAnbu]

Originally Posted by SageoftheSixPaths

And there's nothing to prove you otherwise. Heck, everything you know doesn't even exist. It's a figment of your imagination, another thing that doesn't exist. Nothing exists, actually.

Except me. And including you. But I'm DEFINITELY the only thing that REALLY exists here. You only exist as a figment of my imagination. which doesn't exist. That's the truth of the matter.

Well, if there were a truth.

"But if there's no truth, then there must be only lies?" You are correct, you non-existent speck of nothing. You speak the truth.

"But how can I speak the truth if there are only lies?!" But none of that exists, silly!

The only thing that exists is you. And me. But mostly me. And not you at all. You're only a figment of my non-existent imagination.

For there is only one truth: I exist.

But if that's the only truth, then truth can't exist, either. So there is no truth. Except that one that I already mentioned. Except I didn't mention anything.

Welcome to the world of non-existence.

"True freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four. If that is given, all else follows."

~ George Orwell

[sasu_girl]

Originally Posted by Shikamaru Nara

Yes he does. He is the coexsitence of anti-red.

otay then =3

[321zigzag3]

Originally Posted by SageoftheSixPaths

And there's nothing to prove you otherwise. Heck, everything you know doesn't even exist. It's a figment of your imagination, another thing that doesn't exist. Nothing exists, actually.

Except me. And including you. But I'm DEFINITELY the only thing that REALLY exists here. You only exist as a figment of my imagination. which doesn't exist. That's the truth of the matter.

Well, if there were a truth.

"But if there's no truth, then there must be only lies?" You are correct, you non-existent speck of nothing. You speak the truth.

"But how can I speak the truth if there are only lies?!" But none of that exists, silly!

The only thing that exists is you. And me. But mostly me. And not you at all. You're only a figment of my non-existent imagination.

For there is only one truth: I exist.

But if that's the only truth, then truth can't exist, either. So there is no truth. Except that one that I already mentioned. Except I didn't mention anything.

Welcome to the world of non-existence.

This sounds a lot more sophisticated and altered version of Ono-ism.

[GwynethUchiha]

That is a good theroy it might be true or not

[AkiraNeko]

I actually understood most of that. Is that bad?