Asexual Marriage Debate

[Kunoichi]

yeah that was my reaction 12 posts ago, just jump on the bandwagon, fire your shotgun and say something damning about "the man"

[mrsticky005]

Originally Posted by Devils Lawyer

So what if you have a multiple personality disorder and marry yourself? Would that still count as being asexual considering you are technically marrying another person with the same body.

There's a reason it's called a disorder, you know?

Your mental state does not affect the fact that you are married to yourself.

[mrsticky005]

Remember that the father of the BRIDE pays for the wedding...

So free honey moon vacation for asexual newlywed men!!

[mrsticky005]

Asexual wedding vows:

I take myself to be my awfully wedded spouse to have and to kinda hold but not really for richer but probably more likely poorer, in sickness and in health, hopefully the latter because I don't think I could afford the hospital bill. Until death do I part.

"You may kiss the bride er yourself"

"on the mouth?"

"naturally"

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

[Throw Rasen-Shuriken]

Considering that it still involves two people, I don't see why that it can not be legal to marry, being asexual means basically a relationship with no sexual intercourse, so I don't see why, that it shouldn't be legallized, I mean some marriages already end up with having no sexual intercourse in the later years, anyway.

[mrsticky005]

Originally Posted by Throw Rasen-Shuriken

Considering that it still involves two people, I don't see why that it can not be legal to marry, being asexual means basically a relationship with no sexual intercourse, so I don't see why, that it shouldn't be legallized, I mean some marriages already end up with having no sexual intercourse in the later years, anyway.

I think you're a bit confused as to what we mean by Asexual Marriage
We don't mean two people who are NONsexual. We mean agamogenesis.


Or something to that effect

[Throw Rasen-Shuriken]

And simply put, the definition I know of for asexual is this.
1. Having no evident sex or sex organs; sexless.
2. Relating to, produced by, or involving reproduction that occurs without the union of male and female gametes, as in binary fission or budding.
3. Lacking interest in or desire for sex.

The title simply was asexual marriage, two people with no desire for sex, does not mean that they never would want to have someone for a companion in life, so in that sense, I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be legal to be married.

[mrsticky005]

Originally Posted by Throw Rasen-Shuriken

And simply put, the definition I know of for asexual is this.
1. Having no evident sex or sex organs; sexless.
2. Relating to, produced by, or involving reproduction that occurs without the union of male and female gametes, as in binary fission or budding.
3. Lacking interest in or desire for sex.

The title simply was asexual marriage, two people with no desire for sex, does not mean that they never would want to have someone for a companion in life, so in that sense, I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be legal to be married.

Number two is what we mean by asexual marriage.

In other words:

Marrying yourself.

Do you think it should be made legal to marry yourself?

[Devils Lawyer]

Got my wedding song already." Loving you Is easy because you're beautiful...."

[AgentShayd]

Originally Posted by mrsticky005

But what about Asexual divorce?

Well it would be cheaper. >.>

[Ninja of Cao]

*coughs*

Dear forum members, supporters and critics of the Alexshinist Revolutionary Party, those who maintain a neutral political standing, socialists and liberalists alike.

Your proposal is a very outstanding idea, though not necessarily in a negative way. Since I personally knows a person who does not desire a relationship, sexuality or marriage at all, asexual marriage could be a useful change in his life. However, I do not believe that it would be accepted by many priests to marry a person to himself/herself, which is why I instead propose other benefits for asexuals in the world. One of my leading proposals is to enable adoptions into asexual families (or should I say, to an asexual person), as it is quite difficult to have your own child in a relationship with yourself...

In short, I do not believe that asexual marriage is something that the world will accept. However, I do wish to introduce adoption even by a single person, asexual or not. Why does it have to be a couple to take care of a child? Many people that are alone after divorce take care of their children very well, so why shouldn't an asexual person be able to handle a child? I propose the immediate introduction of asexual adoption.

- Ninja of Cao, party leader and spokesman for the Alexshinist Revolutionary Party (ARP)

[TheJaceX]

What?
Marrying clones?
When was that not legal?
Hey, Cao long time no see

[Kreegah!!!]

Originally Posted by Ninja of Cao

*coughs*

Dear forum members, supporters and critics of the Alexshinist Revolutionary Party, those who maintain a neutral political standing, socialists and liberalists alike.

Your proposal is a very outstanding idea, though not necessarily in a negative way. Since I personally knows a person who does not desire a relationship, sexuality or marriage at all, asexual marriage could be a useful change in his life. However, I do not believe that it would be accepted by many priests to marry a person to himself/herself, which is why I instead propose other benefits for asexuals in the world. One of my leading proposals is to enable adoptions into asexual families (or should I say, to an asexual person), as it is quite difficult to have your own child in a relationship with yourself...

In short, I do not believe that asexual marriage is something that the world will accept. However, I do wish to introduce adoption even by a single person, asexual or not. Why does it have to be a couple to take care of a child? Many people that are alone after divorce take care of their children very well, so why shouldn't an asexual person be able to handle a child? I propose the immediate introduction of asexual adoption.

- Ninja of Cao, party leader and spokesman for the Alexshinist Revolutionary Party (ARP)

Excellent notion! I propose a civil union instead of marriage--after all, union means one entity, so....

[mrsticky005]

Originally Posted by TheJaceX

What?
Marrying clones?
When was that not legal?
Hey, Cao long time no see

No, not marrying clones. Marrying yourself as in you marrying you
and not your clone. Your clone is not you it is a clone of you.

[AgentShayd]

Originally Posted by Kreegah!!!

Excellent notion! I propose a civil union instead of marriage--after all, union means one entity, so....

So I can safely argue whats mine is mine and whats yours is mine too, in a civil union?

I think Sticky should lead the way to the white house and DEMAND Asexual marriage. That will through both the republicans and democrats for a loop.