No partying for Dalai Lama and Arch Bishop

Danielle · 10-05-2011, 11:29 PM

Just because Pres Zuma did not want to upset China?
http://www.economist.com/blogs/baoba...l/calmdowndear

I am sorry Zuma, but that is the stupidest thing I have ever heard. What is the point of barring two men from visiting each other for a birthday party? Not much underhanded politics are going to happen between the Arch Bishop and the Delai Lama.

Wooster · 10-06-2011, 07:41 PM

Well, Obama delayed meeting him. Pansy.

Danielle · 10-06-2011, 07:46 PM

He is a pansy >.> Again, he fails at liberalism.

mrsticky005 · 10-07-2011, 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danielle

He is a pansy >.> Again, he fails at liberalism.

Eh I think Obama is pretty liberal. The thing is that he's a politician.
So he's going to try to do more moderate things every once in a while
to try and get the moderate vote so people think he's a centrist
when he's actually a left winger.

Also sometimes he simply CAN'T act liberally even though he probably
wants to. Things are a lot different on the campaign then in the white house.
It's easy to say on the campaign that you'll do this or that but not so much
when you're president.

Wooster · 10-07-2011, 06:22 PM

See that's the problem. Liberals love Dali, college kid morons, and China, the New York Times Thomas Friedman.
It is a no win situation.

mrsticky005 · 10-07-2011, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wooster

See that's the problem. Liberals love Dali, college kid morons, and China, the New York Times Thomas Friedman.
It is a no win situation.

Do conservatives hate the Dali, college kid morons, China, the New York Times, and Thomas Friedman never to be confused with Milton Friedman?

Space Cowboy Sasori · 10-07-2011, 07:58 PM

Cause if the Dalai Llama went to a birthday party, it'd be the greatest party ever. Zumba is obviously scared that he'll be dethroned on the party front of things. Plus the Dalai Llama and Arch Bishop probably wreak at beer pong, and Zumba is one of those people who things he's amazing but in reality is just really bad, not to mention the fact his partner is probably a lightweight.

just my interpretation.

Wooster · 10-07-2011, 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrsticky005

Do conservatives hate the Dali, college kid morons, China, the New York Times, and Thomas Friedman never to be confused with Milton Friedman?

No, Yes, Sometimes, Yes, No, they mock him and his China love.

mrsticky005 · 10-07-2011, 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wooster

No, Yes, Sometimes, Yes, No, they mock him and his China love.

So conservatives don't hate dali.

They do hate college kid morons.

They sometimes hate China.

They don't hate the New York Times (really? I thought it was liberal? I might be getting it confused with another paper though.)

and they mock THOMAS Friedman of his China love, yes?

Milton Friedman has CHICAGO love.

Wooster · 10-08-2011, 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrsticky005

So conservatives don't hate dali.

They do hate college kid morons.

They sometimes hate China.

They don't hate the New York Times (really? I thought it was liberal? I might be getting it confused with another paper though.)

and they mock THOMAS Friedman of his China love, yes?

Milton Friedman has CHICAGO love.

I think you misread my fourth item.

<Aurega?> · 10-08-2011, 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danielle

Just because Pres Zuma did not want to upset China?
http://www.economist.com/blogs/baoba...l/calmdowndear

I am sorry Zuma, but that is the stupidest thing I have ever heard. What is the point of barring two men from visiting each other for a birthday party? Not much underhanded politics are going to happen between the Arch Bishop and the Delai Lama.

Now I'm not saying China is correct in doing this, but they have branded the dalai lama as a separatist leader who is inciting trouble in China, and blames him for multiple terrorist acts conducted in many areas in China.

Must the same way the US braded Osama Bin Laden.

Zuma is doing this because China is known to discriminate against countries who support a "terrorist" in their mind. Is it the same if a country was allowing osama bin laden a visa into their country (if he still lived), US would certainly enact sanctions against that country.

It's politics and about the best interest of the country really.

mrsticky005 · 10-08-2011, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wooster

I think you misread my fourth item.

Ok then they DO hate the NY Times?

Wooster · 10-08-2011, 01:59 PM

Yes, indeed.

10-05-2011, 11:29 PM	#1
Danielle Special Jonin Candidate Join Date: May 2010 Location: Cali Posts: 14,700 Rep Power: 11	No partying for Dalai Lama and Arch Bishop Just because Pres Zuma did not want to upset China? http://www.economist.com/blogs/baoba...l/calmdowndear I am sorry Zuma, but that is the stupidest thing I have ever heard. What is the point of barring two men from visiting each other for a birthday party? Not much underhanded politics are going to happen between the Arch Bishop and the Delai Lama. __________________

10-06-2011, 07:41 PM	#2
Wooster Special Jonin Candidate Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 36,978 Rep Power: 32	Re: No partying for Dalai Lama and Arch Bishop Well, Obama delayed meeting him. Pansy. __________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

10-06-2011, 07:46 PM	#3
Danielle Special Jonin Candidate Join Date: May 2010 Location: Cali Posts: 14,700 Rep Power: 11	Re: No partying for Dalai Lama and Arch Bishop He is a pansy >.> Again, he fails at liberalism. __________________

10-07-2011, 06:22 PM	#5
Wooster Special Jonin Candidate Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 36,978 Rep Power: 32	Re: No partying for Dalai Lama and Arch Bishop See that's the problem. Liberals love Dali, college kid morons, and China, the New York Times Thomas Friedman. It is a no win situation. __________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

10-08-2011, 01:59 PM	#13
Wooster Special Jonin Candidate Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 36,978 Rep Power: 32	Re: No partying for Dalai Lama and Arch Bishop Yes, indeed. __________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)