Regarding the description for the Multiverse section

[Kaleidoscope]

Hi. Some of you might know me as UM or Genius from moviecodec and based of a certain turn of events I decided to join this forum instead. Now I know that there are people out there biased against me defiantly rejecting everything I post. But I'd like you to drop any prejudices and try to stay civil and open minded throughout the arguments of this topic. After all, we're all here to make the forums a better place.

Now my first complain of this forum is for the Multiverse section where we have the description: "Multiverse Anything goes in this forum. Any multiverse, any fight. Just know in advance that Kakashi can't beat Superman."

Now the quotation implies a highly debatable premise as absolute and seem to impose restrictions upon being open minded.

Are people not allowed to believe that Kakashi can beat Superman? Are they not allowed to debate for it?

What proof and evidence could anyone post that would impose that restriction? I read a lot of comics and I enjoy the stories and based of my experience there's not a shred of evidence present in the canon material that would seal the deal.

Based of consistent showings (the general agreement of the authors) I would say that Kakashi would in fact be able to defeat Superman. I am willing to debate this if so required, but since it's not necessary for the debate let's not go off in that tangent.

The question of the topic is, why would you have a bias description for the Multiverse section?

[Frost ninja]

Its a simple warning. In the battlegrounds, if fights are one-sided then they get locked. Thus that part is hooked on the end in order to inform people that if fights are one-sided then there may be issues.

Kakashi can't beat superman is the example of an extreme one-sided battle. The opposition of superman wouldn't be able to form an accurate form of a debate and it would eventually lead in irrelevants and useless arguments which take away from the overall experience in the battlegrounds.

We don't need topics 80 pages long over how one-sided a fight is. Thus, we give the example.

But to answer your issues, Superman is classified as a faster-than-light casual planet buster whose only true weakness has been shown to be kryptonite and red sun rays (or something).

Above this he can fly and survive in upper-atomspheric conditions. There is no chance for kakashi to indeed prevent superman from flying into the upper atmospheres and simply destroying the planet by some mean or another. Kamui is not near fast or accurate enough to catch a FTL person.

Above this, superman's fists break meteorites up to I think class 10 size (small-moon type) and beyond. Kakashi can't react to a FTL moving man of steel, so superman uberblitzes and crushes the skull in.

There is no counters for this unless the OP restricts the argument heavily. In this case, there is an exception.

[Kaleidoscope]

Originally Posted by Frost ninja

Its a simple warning. In the battlegrounds, if fights are one-sided then they get locked. Thus that part is hooked on the end in order to inform people that if fights are one-sided then there may be issues.

Such a bold statement would require rigorous proof. The banning of battles ought not to be something a moderator decides the outcome of.

Originally Posted by Frost ninja

Kakashi can't beat superman is the example of an extreme one-sided battle. The opposition of superman wouldn't be able to form an accurate form of a debate and it would eventually lead in irrelevants and useless arguments which take away from the overall experience in the battlegrounds.

Incorrect. Kakashi's in-story capabilities and powers would suggest that he'd be a top tier powerhouse in DC comics. While Superman have trouble putting down Booster Gold, Kakashi is casually able to bring down two Chuunin without any signs of effort.

Originally Posted by Frost ninja

We don't need topics 80 pages long over how one-sided a fight is. Thus, we give the example.

If a topic goes out of hand it should be closed. I'm not arguing with you there. But closing something before the it reaches two pages because you don't think it's going to end well ultimately restricts the experience of the posters.

Perhaps someone had written a elaborate and credible explanation as of why Kakashi would win and wouldn't be able to post it because you closed the thread before he was able to.

[Frost ninja]

Originally Posted by Kaleidoscope

Such a bold statement would require rigorous proof. The banning of battles ought not to be something a moderator decides the outcome of.

It ought to be something the debaters decide upon as a concensus.
If 50 people say its a stomp, then its likely a stomp.
If the vets and all know its a stomp and can verify, then its locked.

Incorrect. Kakashi's in-story capabilities and powers would suggest that he'd be a top tier powerhouse in DC comics. While Superman have trouble putting down Booster Gold, Kakashi is casually able to bring down two Chuunin without any signs of effort.

Speed difference. Kakashi is transonic, Superman is faster than light.
230-470 m/s or so vs something thats 180,000 miles per sec or something to that effect. The math is obvious. Above this, explain how kakashi survives a planet exploding from under him... Or a meteor-crushing punch caving in the skull.

If a topic goes out of hand it should be closed. I'm not arguing with you there. But closing something before the it reaches two pages because you don't think it's going to end well ultimately restricts the experience of the posters.

It enhances the environment for everyone else.
If its obvious by differences in power as extreme as it requires for there to be a lock, then a lock is administered.

Perhaps someone had written a elaborate and credible explanation as of why Kakashi would win and wouldn't be able to post it because you closed the thread before he was able to.

No such argument exists. If it WAS indeed possible, the restrictions would have to be heavy and thus, is an exception.

in red

[Nyruss]

Originally Posted by Kaleidoscope

Incorrect. Kakashi's in-story capabilities and powers would suggest that he'd be a top tier powerhouse in DC comics.

[Noctis Arashi]

What? Kakashi can't survive in space, and blow the planet back into place, by blowing. No. Just no.

[colorles]

hey Harlequin/genius/UM/whateva, nice to see you here

i'm a regular at the lounge as well; anyways somone named 'Uber' has been imperonating you lately and posting gay black porn/itachi and sasuke hentai, and King Arthur seems to be crashing the site as we speak, gotta love that place

[The 1st Hokage]

That just means we've had that debate, and it ended horribly. I remember it too. Almost as bad as may Naruto vs. Sonic thread, but it's antient history.

It's just an inside joke to the veterans who have been here a long time.

[Phoenix Wright]

OMFG HARLEQUIN O_O
Alright this is pure epic, never expected you to join here.
So lulzy, Genius, you're so epic. I've had a secret love for you ever since I went to MvC for the lulz once(nohomo).
Because you're just pure awesome.

Alright screw it, Kakashi beats Superman!!

To be honest though, I've seen what happens in MvC, so what happens with debates including ya here should be pretty hilarious as usual.

Originally Posted by colorles

hey Harlequin/genius/UM/whateva, nice to see you here

i'm a regular at the lounge as well; anyways somone named 'Uber' has been imperonating you lately and posting gay black porn/itachi and sasuke hentai, and King Arthur seems to be crashing the site as we speak, gotta love that place

I asked you before but who are you in MvC? Are you red line?

Lol I like how you just randomly blurt that out it was funny.

[colorles]

i have a few accounts on MvC

[Nyruss]

Improbable. Your stupidity would be magnified by inconceivable levels, but I have never seen you make any claim nearly stupid as Kakashi being top tier in DC.

[Phoenix Wright]

DM, Harlequin is Genius(lol see what I did there). Therefore if he says Kakashi>Superman, then he does.

Nah not really. Sure we might have different views, but I respect Harlequin for having the unpopular opinion and being epic in general./mainly not true

Yeah he might think that Kakashi>/=Superman, but I mean when he says that kind of stuff and debates for it, so much epic crap goes down, it's so hilarious and uber awesome./mainly true


So anyway colorles, what are your accounts, are you red line though?

[colorles]

lol Harlequin seems to be taking a nap at the moment; however just let it be known hes the most notable and epic naruto supporter on the internets

oh and Pheonix, how could you tell? prolly by my avitar i suppose lol

[Phoenix Wright]

No doubt

Well, you both talked similar so I kind of figured, I haven't been to MvC in awhile though so I dunno about the avatar.

[Shikamaru Nara]

Genius troll.