SM naruto vs Kakuzu - Page 2

Daybreak · 04-13-2010, 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jinchiruuki

Just FYI regular rasengan has no elemental affinitly...so the rasengan vs chidori doesn't mean anything..everything else I agree with.

Ah wasnt aware of that, thanks for the info appreciate it

[Shikamaru] · 04-13-2010, 12:40 PM

FRS would wipe Kakuzu to nothing.

Naruto is also physically stronger, so he would rip and pull Kakuzu's threads right toward a Tsunade Scale punch to Kakuzu's face.

I see no time for Kakuzu to release hearts, considering one blitz with his physical strength would probably be enough to destroy Kakuzu.

FRS is overkill.

crystalblade13 · 04-13-2010, 12:43 PM

ROFLSTOMP in narutos favor. sage mode is so much faster and stronger than kakuzu that nothing kakuzu does would make any difference in naruto owning him.

Miles Edgeworth · 04-13-2010, 07:50 PM

Prasanth, I HIGHLY suggest you stop wanking and learn your feats. Your threads are getting annoying, and your arguments are even worse.

SM Naruto stomps this. While Base Naruto at the time was not necessarily capable of defeating Kakuzu at full health, there's a huge margin between Wind Arc Base Naruto and SM Naruto. SM Naruto is nowhere near Kakuzu's speed, since Base Naruto was able to keep up with Kakuzu and SM Naruto is much faster than Base. Considering FRS was able to annihilate the hearts in base, SM FRS one shots him.

Fire jutsu counter FRS? Please, show me when Kakuzu has demonstrated S-Rank Fire Release. By your logic, Fireball Jutsu>FRS merely because of element advantage. That is not true, it only applies if the jutsu levels are equal or close to it.

By your logic, a water gun can put out a forest fire. That is not the case.

I'm going to lock this.

04-13-2010, 12:40 PM	#22
[Shikamaru] Special Jonin Candidate Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: PA, USA. Posts: 7,504 Rep Power: 0 Member's Picture Albums	Re: SM naruto vs Kakuzu FRS would wipe Kakuzu to nothing. Naruto is also physically stronger, so he would rip and pull Kakuzu's threads right toward a Tsunade Scale punch to Kakuzu's face. I see no time for Kakuzu to release hearts, considering one blitz with his physical strength would probably be enough to destroy Kakuzu. FRS is overkill. Last edited by [Shikamaru]; 04-13-2010 at 12:45 PM.

04-13-2010, 12:43 PM	#23
crystalblade13 Veteran Chunin Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: everywhere, and nowhere...all at the same time Posts: 1,248 Rep Power: 8	Re: SM naruto vs Kakuzu ROFLSTOMP in narutos favor. sage mode is so much faster and stronger than kakuzu that nothing kakuzu does would make any difference in naruto owning him. __________________ captain of the flying awesome ship of awesomeness . believe it! To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. " I'll take a potato chip, AND EAT IT!!! " - light yagami .___ (>_<) I'll have the Samehada just you wait!! /----\ Put this on your siggy if you love Suigetsu.

04-13-2010, 07:50 PM	#24
Miles Edgeworth Special Jonin Candidate Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: St. Mystere Posts: 10,448 Rep Power: 12	Re: SM naruto vs Kakuzu Prasanth, I HIGHLY suggest you stop wanking and learn your feats. Your threads are getting annoying, and your arguments are even worse. SM Naruto stomps this. While Base Naruto at the time was not necessarily capable of defeating Kakuzu at full health, there's a huge margin between Wind Arc Base Naruto and SM Naruto. SM Naruto is nowhere near Kakuzu's speed, since Base Naruto was able to keep up with Kakuzu and SM Naruto is much faster than Base. Considering FRS was able to annihilate the hearts in base, SM FRS one shots him. Fire jutsu counter FRS? Please, show me when Kakuzu has demonstrated S-Rank Fire Release. By your logic, Fireball Jutsu>FRS merely because of element advantage. That is not true, it only applies if the jutsu levels are equal or close to it. By your logic, a water gun can put out a forest fire. That is not the case. I'm going to lock this.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)