NATO and US involvement in fall of middle easter dictators

[White Zetsu]

for or against NATO and US involvement in the fall of Ghadafi(libya) and Mubaraks(egypt)regimes?? personally im against it, because how do we know who we're putting in are going to be any better?? how do we know they wont start a war with isreal?? and finally im against it because US troops are spread far to thin right now we didnt need a 3rd war

[mrsticky005]

We should at least finish with Iraq and Afghanistan first.

[Bacon]

We are the united states, we can police all of the middle east + asia probs.

I thought the combat mission in Iraq was finished? :lol:

[Danielle]

Eastern, not Easter. Easter is holiday for yummy stuff.

[Wooster]

It would have been nice if it was against dictators that are the enemies currently, like Assad, before we take down ones that only hurt their own people. `:roll:

[Sephiroth]

Funny there is not really US involement, now From NATO yes but thats 28 different countries. They porbbaly just supplied the rebels and done the air strikes, but as for ground troops i highly doubt there is any

[Wooster]

Eastern, not Easter. Easter is holiday for yummy stuff.
Also, the resurrection of Christ. o.o

[Danielle]

Also, the resurrection of Christ. o.o
But more for sweets. >.>

[mrsticky005]

We are the united states, we can police all of the middle east + asia probs.

I thought the combat mission in Iraq was finished? :lol:

Yes but we're still there aren't we?

As long as we have to stay there then it's still a problem.
If it's not a problem then we shouldn't be staying there.